What aspect of the Iowa Dental Board's actions is true regarding potential disclosures?

The rationale behind the statement that the Board cannot disclose names without formal action is tied to confidentiality provisions that protect individuals involved in the investigative process. In many regulatory scenarios, including those concerning dental hygiene, individual rights to privacy must be balanced with the public's interest in transparency. Without a formal action, such as a disciplinary proceeding or a ruling that establishes findings of fact regarding an individual's behavior, the Board typically adheres to confidentiality rules that prevent them from releasing any identifying information about individuals under investigation. This safeguards both the integrity of the investigation and the privacy of those involved until due process has been completed. The need for formal actions ensures that no name or identifying information is disclosed prematurely or without justification, thereby upholding ethical standards within the practice.

In contrast, other options suggest actions that may not align with the principles of due process or confidentiality. The notion of routinely disclosing all findings or investigations does not accommodate the necessary privacy considerations until a formal conclusion is reached, nor does it reflect the careful handling expected in regulatory matters. This understanding reinforces the importance of adhering to confidentiality standards while balancing transparency obligations.